Ebook discussions flying under the radar

Mirrored from Infotropism. You can comment there or here.

A couple of weeks ago, I started seeing a pile of blog discussion about ebook piracy. It all started on January 12th, when Australian fan lucyham tweeted to author Sarah Rees Brennan:

Apologies. Have just torrented The Demon’s Lexicon. Will buy when laggardly, pickpocketing, luddite publishers in Aus get around to allowing Australians to buy books off Amazon. So sick of “Aussies can’t purchase this book” message.

A twitter storm ensued, which quickly made it to various blogs. Author Saundra Mitchell posted on her blog and also on her LiveJournal, saying:

If even HALF of those people who downloaded my book that week had bought it, I would have hit the New York Times Bestseller list. If the 800+ downloads a week of my book were only HALF converted into sales, I would earn out in one more month. But I’m never going to earn out. And my book is never going to be available in your $region, not for lack of trying.

Things took off quickly; there were almost 20 posts that day, mostly in response to Mitchell. In the next two weeks, or a little more, almost a hundred posts on the subject sprang up, more than two-thirds of which were on LiveJournal or Dreamwidth (a LiveJournal-like site, based on the same code; many people crosspost between the two.)

Reading these posts as they flowed past, I noticed several interesting things about them. Firstly, many of them were addressing the issues of ebook piracy from an angle I had never seen before, criticising the capitalist structures of book distribution and intellectual property from a social justice perspective. Secondly, most of the posts seemed to be by women. Thirdly, nobody outside the circles of LJ/DW fandom and social justice circles seemed to be noticing. It seemed a pity. I’m a regular reader or visitor to many tech blogs, including O’Reilly Radar, TechCrunch, ReadWriteWeb, and pop-culture-meets-tech blogs like Boing Boing, any of which might have picked up this story and run with it, if they’d been in the loop.

I wondered, though, whether I was missing something. I know that we tend to follow people most like ourselves online, and read things that reinforce our own views and opinions. If men disproportionately follow other men, maybe I’m disproportionately reading posts by women, and there were a whole bunch of posts by men that I’d missed. It’s happened before, after all.

Tonight I decided to investigate. Using Google Blog Search and following links from any posts I found, I put together a spreadsheet of posts, 112 in all, on the subjects of ebook piracy and international distribution, between Jan 10th and Jan 27th. (Why Jan 10th rather than 12th? Turns out that O’Reilly Radar had posted an article about ebook piracy and DRM on the 10th, which was referenced by other bloggers over the next few days, so it seemed worth including. More notes on my methods and choices made are at the bottom of this post.)

I then took the spreadsheet and ran it through a few lines of Perl to generate the following GraphViz graph:

Visualisation of the ebooks discussion. Version 1.0, 2011-02-01. Full image: SVG, PNG

Key:

• A <- B means that post B linked to post A
• Gender of poster is shown by colour of the nodes (pink for female, blue for male, grey for unknown/other)

Here’s what’s going on.

• The giant tangled blob taking up most of the image is the discussion sparked by lucyham’s illegal download of Sarah Rees Brennan’s book, and Saundra Mitchell’s subsequent blog post. As you can see, there are the best part of 100 posts, mostly by women. This discussion ran from at least the 12th to the 27th of January (and the post you’re reading right now extends it into February).
• At the top of the chart are some small clusters showing conversations not connected to the main LJ/DW conversation. The first is small cluster mostly around posts by Chris Walker of booksprung.com, criticising publishers who don’t make their books available to Australian consumers. This discussion ran from at least Jan 11th to 25th, but never crossed over with the discussion sparked by lucyham (also Australian).
• Just below that is a set of posts about ebook piracy and DRM circumvention, mostly centred around O’Reilly Radar’s interview with Brian O’Leary, who says that DRM doesn’t prevent piracy. O’Reilly run the Tools of Change for Publishing conference, and that blog post was part of the lead-up to that event. This discussion played out from the 10th to the 18th of January, without linking to any of the other discussions in progress. (Nor, to be fair, being linked from them; the community discussing ebooks in January was as unaware of O’Reilly as O’Reilly were of them.)
• At the extreme top right, a single post by Mike Shatzkin, on the globalisation of ebook publishing, was posted on Jan 21st but doesn’t link to any of the aforementioned conversations. It’s included purely because of its topicality, even though it wasn’t connected to anything else.

I’m not sure what conclusions to draw from this, other than that my gut feeling was correct: there was a really fascinating, complicated, crunchy conversation going on, mostly among women, mostly on LJ/DW, that the tech blogs and other parts of the web don’t seem to have noticed. Make of that what you will.

If you missed the discussion and would like to catch up on some of the highlights, I would recommend:

• Troisroyaumes On piracy and copyright is a roundup of social-justice criticisms of the ebook piracy issue; it’s a great entry into that side of the debate.
• First-person accounts of acquiring books outside of affluent, English-speaking countries: qian in Malaysia, Marina in Israel, wistfuljane in Vietnam, Aurora in Colombia, Charles in the Philippines
• Elf has several really solid posts on different aspects of the discussion: on business models, books are not music, on authors who say “the poor should not be reading my books”
• Authors who publicly changed their minds as a result of the discussion: Karen Healey, Jim Hines.

Links to all ~100 posts are in the spreadsheet o’ doom.

( Read the rest of this entry » )

Wanted: recommended DW journals for non DWers

[DW-only, not crossposted from Infotropism]

So I keep talking to non-DW people and telling them how great things are over here. I offer them an invitation and encourage them to sign up. But I'd really like to be able to offer them some tips on where to start reading. Obviously this will vary according to the person's individual interests, but I promised one friend I'd put together a "recommended reading" list to get him started, and realised it might be a useful resource for more than just him.

So, what journals would you recommend I put on that list? I'm particularly interested in:

* people who make thoughtful/insightful/clever posts
* consistent quality
* range of subject matter (would particularly appreciate anyone who posts about tech, as that's the field many of the people I'm talking to come from)
* range of viewpoints (non-US voices especially welcome)
* not too heavy fannish/transformative-works content (some is fine, but don't want to overload; meta is probably better than fanworks)
* either individual journals or communities are fine

You can see what I've got so far at http://skud.dreamwidth.org/read/recommended